beamish, nauseating, defensive
On Teacher Quality and the Question of Education
Long term teachers are the most effective in that they are experienced and established. I have no doubt that long term teachers are better at what they do—they’ve spent years learning how to do it, and many have mastered the craft. Unfortunately, we don’t have as many as we need to. If there is any way to encourage veteran teachers to stay in high-needs areas, I’m all ears. Unfortunately, the situation now is that we have a teacher shortage, one that needs to be dealt with immediately.
I agree with Berry’s criticisms of TFA. I would even go so far as to say that TFA provides less adequate preparation than MTC does, setting unrealistic goals, promoting rampant idealism, and being slightly imperialistic in nature. Although TFA teachers are well educated (and presumably bright), their background in no way prepares them for teaching anywhere, let alone in high-needs areas. By the time they’ve finally figured out what they’re doing, they’ll be gone, off to law school or a doctorate program, their resume nicely fattened by the social work they’ve done. One could argue that these “young adult” teachers are calculating mercenaries, spending two years as martyrs in order to eventually reap status and prestige. It’s a sort of finishing school for rich kids, I’ve heard local teachers at my school argue, and I find myself hard pressed to disagree.
All that aside, I believe that TFA and MTC are extremely beneficial, and Berry is selling them short. Yes, student scores are low. They already were. What Berry forgets is that these teachers are here because nobody else was available. They’re responding to a critical need, they’re solving the crisis of a teacher shortage. They’re—we’re—teaching the kids that no one else will. And, considering what we have to deal with, we’re doing our best, with all the cards stacked against us.
Whatever Berry may say about young two-year teachers, we’re better than nothing, which, as far as I can see, is the only immediate alternative. We’re here and we’re trying hard. We make mistakes, and we’re misguided, but we have energy, and the desire to affect change, to right social injustice, one child at a time. If nothing else, I think our presence in these schools is unintentionally educational. Our students, many of whom have never left the Delta, are exposed to people from a different culture. They’re exposed to a different way of speaking, a different world view. This experience gives students a glimpse of the world outside the Delta, reminds them that there is an outside world. This is something many other teachers can’t do. Our students are being educated, if only by watching us and observing us every day. This cultural enrichment is something that might open their minds, encourage them to consider the world in a different way. In this respect, for this purpose, we may be more qualified than anyone else.
There’s one more thing to consider, although it certainly shouldn’t take priority over the education of the students. Our students aren’t the only ones being educated. These bright young minds may not stay in teaching, but many of us will go on to be influential, leaders in whatever field we choose. Many of us have been sheltered, but now we are being educated, and our experience of teaching here will influence the choices we make, the values and priorities we have, and the way we decide to run the world. Ultimately, this might have the most influence, if fifteen years down the road, on public education, and on the kids of the kids who have taught us so much.
Long term teachers are the most effective in that they are experienced and established. I have no doubt that long term teachers are better at what they do—they’ve spent years learning how to do it, and many have mastered the craft. Unfortunately, we don’t have as many as we need to. If there is any way to encourage veteran teachers to stay in high-needs areas, I’m all ears. Unfortunately, the situation now is that we have a teacher shortage, one that needs to be dealt with immediately.
I agree with Berry’s criticisms of TFA. I would even go so far as to say that TFA provides less adequate preparation than MTC does, setting unrealistic goals, promoting rampant idealism, and being slightly imperialistic in nature. Although TFA teachers are well educated (and presumably bright), their background in no way prepares them for teaching anywhere, let alone in high-needs areas. By the time they’ve finally figured out what they’re doing, they’ll be gone, off to law school or a doctorate program, their resume nicely fattened by the social work they’ve done. One could argue that these “young adult” teachers are calculating mercenaries, spending two years as martyrs in order to eventually reap status and prestige. It’s a sort of finishing school for rich kids, I’ve heard local teachers at my school argue, and I find myself hard pressed to disagree.
All that aside, I believe that TFA and MTC are extremely beneficial, and Berry is selling them short. Yes, student scores are low. They already were. What Berry forgets is that these teachers are here because nobody else was available. They’re responding to a critical need, they’re solving the crisis of a teacher shortage. They’re—we’re—teaching the kids that no one else will. And, considering what we have to deal with, we’re doing our best, with all the cards stacked against us.
Whatever Berry may say about young two-year teachers, we’re better than nothing, which, as far as I can see, is the only immediate alternative. We’re here and we’re trying hard. We make mistakes, and we’re misguided, but we have energy, and the desire to affect change, to right social injustice, one child at a time. If nothing else, I think our presence in these schools is unintentionally educational. Our students, many of whom have never left the Delta, are exposed to people from a different culture. They’re exposed to a different way of speaking, a different world view. This experience gives students a glimpse of the world outside the Delta, reminds them that there is an outside world. This is something many other teachers can’t do. Our students are being educated, if only by watching us and observing us every day. This cultural enrichment is something that might open their minds, encourage them to consider the world in a different way. In this respect, for this purpose, we may be more qualified than anyone else.
There’s one more thing to consider, although it certainly shouldn’t take priority over the education of the students. Our students aren’t the only ones being educated. These bright young minds may not stay in teaching, but many of us will go on to be influential, leaders in whatever field we choose. Many of us have been sheltered, but now we are being educated, and our experience of teaching here will influence the choices we make, the values and priorities we have, and the way we decide to run the world. Ultimately, this might have the most influence, if fifteen years down the road, on public education, and on the kids of the kids who have taught us so much.

3 Comments:
I have nothing against TFA/MTC teachers entering into a critical needs area. I just wish that the core preparation for such programs were modified in a way that would help them prepare for real world situtations. There is nothing wrong with exposing our students to new and different ideas and culture. In fact, I want them exposed!
The main problem that I see, from the administrative side, is that districts use the TFA and MTC programs as crutches. Instead of spending more time and effort into recruiting teachers who would become longterm solutions to an already failing problem.
Test scores remain low due to several factors. But, as far as TFA and MTC are concerned, it is my belief that when you have a large turn over within a school (especially in a state testing area) scores are going to be low.
Lets take for example our math department. The math department at our school has been desimated year after year do to new teachers coming and going. Each time they (new teachers) are put into a situtation that requires them to be over a state testing area. So, not only do they have the presure of teaching students, classroom management, discipline, and adminstrators; but now they are responsible for a state testing area that can influence our graduation rate, AYP, and funding. This is a lot to ask of a first year teacher.
I want everyone to understand one thing, experienced teachers have no problem with first year teachers. And, for the record, we don't mind helping out new teachers. We want to help new teachers.
You have an outstanding good and well structured site. I enjoyed browsing through it http://www.data-macintosh-recovery.info/aston_martin_race_pics.html Apw wyott kitchen cooktops Discount ionamin order online Italy travel climate The girls in their summer dresses short story phoenix family wireless plans Nissan stanza xe door panel removal 2002 nissan maxima trouble codes and lexapro beer amg portable dvd player pink Employee travel compensation policies nordica saunas sony dvd vcr players Sili cum valley How to download music to an mp3 player Sofa victorian Online bmw 316i car parts catalogue
Excellent, love it! laser eye surgery and dr walter j stark anti bextra inflammatory What does valium treat Distance learning websites nike flight lightweight sport headphones Medication for high cholesterol energy slot machines free toon sex download
Post a Comment
<< Home